<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://omnivorousfish.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Omnivorous Fish - arrogance</title>
 <link>http://omnivorousfish.com/taxonomy/term/44/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>And the Captain Obvious Award for Exceptional Arrogance goes to...</title>
 <link>http://omnivorousfish.com/node/28</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;And the Captain Obvious Award for Exceptional Arrogance goes to: Wine Spectator&amp;#8217;s James Suckling. Somehow, WS has seen fit to give this nimrod a oped alongside those two excellent writers and wine crusaders James Laube and Matt Kramer. This is a recent development which is completely inexplicable given his utter lack of a gift for language and the pretentious, pedantic way in which he conducts himself in the world of wine. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;#8217;s look back for a moment on that embarrassing treatise he published in the &amp;#8220;Great Cork Debate,&amp;#8221; opposite a piece by James Laube that was both an invigorating piece of writing and a cogent argument for alternative closures for all but the most age-worthy wines. James Laube had necessary facts and figures about screw caps, technical corks, synthetic corks, natural corks and other media, like foil-lined boxes. He had scientific information- and industry conjecture- about each and their effect on aging and longevity and laid out the simple truth that TCA and brett contamination equal one thing to wine lovers: a waste of money. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;James Suckling said cork was traditional, and that having a screw cap undermined the ceremony of opening wine. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Give me a break. The Agent and I crack open four or five bottles a week, twice that if we entertain. Does he really think I get excited every time I have to wrestle the cork out of a bottle (even though I do have a tortoiseshell Laguiole corkscrew)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back to the Award. The latest from this &lt;em&gt;St-Emillon&lt;/em&gt; obsessed ignoramus is his oped this issue (WS 31 Aug 06) called &amp;#8220;I Have Joined the Cult.&amp;#8221; It&amp;#8217;s a sleepy little article about how he went to a tasting of heavy-hit cult cabs from the nineties, given by Swiss collector Silvio Denz. He goes on to list all of his own misguided conceptions about California wines, like how they&amp;#8217;re all high-alcohol fruit-bombs, and how he would never have put them aside the wines of Bordeaux. My personal favorite line is &amp;#8220;I never thought they would age very well.&amp;#8221; I&amp;#8217;m glad I pay $50 a year to be told that Napa cab ages well. I&amp;#8217;m glad he has the attention of an international audience, because we all sat around drinking our Jordans and Caymuses on release, because we could never get 5 or 10 years out of them. Thank you, James Suckling, for saving us. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does he really think he&amp;#8217;s informing us by saying that Araujo and Screaming Eagle are pretty good after all? He ends the article telling us he&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;now a full-fledged member of the California cult.&amp;#8221; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Guess what, Mr Suckling, we don&amp;#8217;t need you. Here&amp;#8217;s your sign.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://omnivorousfish.com/node/28#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://omnivorousfish.com/taxonomy/term/44">arrogance</category>
 <category domain="http://omnivorousfish.com/taxonomy/term/46">assholes</category>
 <category domain="http://omnivorousfish.com/taxonomy/term/45">james suckling</category>
 <category domain="http://omnivorousfish.com/taxonomy/term/43">wine</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:58:07 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>JoeFish</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28 at http://omnivorousfish.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
